Volvo C70 2007 vs Volvo S40 2004

 
Volvo C70
2007 - 2009
Volvo S40
2004 - 2007
Body: CabrioSedan
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP136 HP
Torque: 320 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo C70 and Volvo S40 have the same engine power, but Volvo C70 torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S40. Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.15.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo C70 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C70 could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C70 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway1220 km on highway
810 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.47 m
Width: 1.82 m1.77 m
Height: 1.40 m1.45 m
Volvo C70 is larger, but lower.
Volvo C70 is 11 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 200 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
404 litres883 litres
Volvo S40 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volvo C70 has 204 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. This could mean that the Volvo C70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S40 (by 479 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Volvo S40, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9601`940
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Volvo S40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C70 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 56002400
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo S40 has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv