Volvo C70 2009 vs Chrysler Sebring 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Volvo C70 engine produces 16 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C70 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C70 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is smaller. Volvo C70 is 32 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo C70 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 193 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volvo C70 has 7 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. The Chrysler Sebring may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.67 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |