Volvo C70 2009 vs Mazda MX-5 2008

 
Volvo C70
2009 - 2013
Mazda MX-5
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP161 HP
Torque: 320 NM188 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds8.9 seconds
Mazda MX-5 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo C70 engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda MX-5, but torque is 132 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Due to the lower power, Volvo C70 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.38.0
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo C70 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that by driving the Volvo C70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo C70) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.02 m
Width: 1.84 m1.72 m
Height: 1.40 mno data
Trunk capacity: 200 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.8 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`130no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 10 000no data
Pros and Cons: Volvo C70 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Mazda MX-5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv