Volvo C70 1997 vs Toyota Celica 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volvo C70 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 240 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 330 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 10.7 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 11.3 | 9.9 | |
|
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.33 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger. Volvo C70 is 22 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 262 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`990 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |