Volvo C70 2009 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 220 HP | 122 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 400 NM | 210 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | 6 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.6 | 5.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Scirocco. On average, Volvo C70 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo C70 is 36 cm longer than the Volkswagen Scirocco, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 312 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1006 litres | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo C70 has 92 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`108 | ~ 1`753 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Volkswagen Scirocco has
| |