Volvo C70 2009 vs BMW 3 series 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo C70
2009 - 2013
BMW 3 series
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Volvo C70 is available with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 136 - 220 HP156 - 306 HP
Torque: 220 - 400 NM200 - 540 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 11.8 seconds5.8 - 10.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 9.66.1 - 9.9
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Volvo C70 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.58 m
Width: 1.84 m1.78 m
Height: 1.40 m1.38 m
Volvo C70 is larger.
Volvo C70 is 4 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 404 litres210 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data350 litres
Volvo C70 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo C70 has 194 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`108~ 2`119
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 10 00010 000
Pros and Cons: Volvo C70 has
  • roomier boot
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv