Volvo C30 2006 vs Seat Leon 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Volvo C30 engine produces 23 HP more power than Seat Leon, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Seat Leon. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.3 | |
|
The Seat Leon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo C30 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Leon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C30 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C30 is 7 cm shorter than the Seat Leon, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 233 litres | 341 litres | |
|
Seat Leon has more luggage space. Volvo C30 has 108 litres less trunk space than the Seat Leon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Leon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`925 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Seat Leon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Leon, so Seat Leon quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Seat Leon has
| |