Volvo C30 2009 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Volvo C30 2009 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo C30 2006, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.4 | |
| Volvo C30 2009 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30 2006, which means that by driving the Volvo C30 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Volvo C30 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C30 2009 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo C30 2006, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
921 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volvo C30 2009 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 2006 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Volvo C30 2009, so Volvo C30 2009 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |