Volvo 940 1992 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 940 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.1 | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 940 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Volvo 940 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 and Volvo 960 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 491 litres | |
| Volvo 940 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |