Volvo 940 1990 vs Ford Sierra 1990

 
Volvo 940
1990 - 1994
Ford Sierra
1990 - 1993
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 131 HP120 HP
Torque: 185 NM171 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds10 seconds
Volvo 940 engine produces 11 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Ford Sierra. Despite the higher power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.27.8
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo 940 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 940 could require 360 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 940 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
750 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.47 m
Width: 1.75 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
Volvo 940 is larger.
Volvo 940 is 40 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 471 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Sierra.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8651`350
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Volvo 940 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Sierra has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 18001800
Pros and Cons: Volvo 940 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Ford Sierra has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv