Volvo 940 1996 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 264 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 940 engine produces 18 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volvo 940 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
| |