Volvo 940 1996 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 940 engine produces 12 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, but torque is 28 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Due to the lower power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volvo 940 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |