Volvo 940 1996 vs Honda Saber 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo 940 engine produces 45 HP less power than Honda Saber, but torque is 4 NM more than Honda Saber. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Saber) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 940) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 is 3 cm longer than the Honda Saber, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 940 has 71 litres more trunk space than the Honda Saber. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Honda Saber has
| |