Volvo 940 1990 vs Volvo 850 1993

 
Volvo 940
1990 - 1992
Volvo 850
1993 - 1994
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 165 HP226 HP
Torque: 264 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.8 seconds
Volvo 940 engine produces 61 HP less power than Volvo 850, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Volvo 850.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data9.7
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres73 litres
490 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo 850) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 940) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.81 m4.71 m
Width: 1.75 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Volvo 940 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 992 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2125 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo 850.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`600
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Volvo 850 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 940 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo 850, so Volvo 850 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 2400600
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo 850 has
    • more power
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv