Volvo 940 1990 vs Volvo 960 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 165 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 264 NM | 233 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Volvo 940 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 940 engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo 960, but torque is 31 NM more than Volvo 960. Despite less power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 12.0 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
The Volvo 960 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo 940 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Volvo 940 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo 940 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
500 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo 940 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 992 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | 2125 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo 960. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`060 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |