Volvo 940 1990 vs Volvo 850 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo 850 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 940 engine produces 48 HP less power than Volvo 850, but torque is 20 NM more than Volvo 850. Due to the lower power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 940 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Volvo 940 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 940 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo 850) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 940) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo 940 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo 850. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Volvo 850 has
| |