Volvo 940 1990 vs Ford Scorpio 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 940 engine produces 6 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, but torque is 20 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 940 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Volvo 940 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo 940 is smaller. Volvo 940 is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo 940 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |