Volvo 940 1990 vs VAZ 2104 1984
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 92 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 23 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 940 engine produces 58 HP more power than VAZ 2104, whereas torque is 148 NM more than VAZ 2104. Thanks to more power Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 11 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.7 | |
|
The VAZ 2104 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 940 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the VAZ 2104, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 940 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo 940 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo 940 is 70 cm longer than the VAZ 2104, 13 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
VAZ 2104 has
| |