Volvo 940 1994 vs Volvo 850 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo 850 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 940 engine produces 91 HP less power than Volvo 850, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo 850. Due to the lower power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo 940 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 940 could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo 940 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo 850) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 940) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo 940 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo 850. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Volvo 850 has
| |