Volvo 940 1990 vs Jaguar XJ 1986
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | 2.9 - 4.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 165 HP | 150 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 264 NM | 225 - 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 16.5 seconds | 7.3 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 10.3 | 10.3 - 11.9 | |
|
Volvo 940 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Volvo 940 is smaller, but slightly higher. Volvo 940 is 12 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 2.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Volvo 940 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`878 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |