Volvo 940 1996 vs Honda Saber 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volvo 940 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Honda Saber is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volvo 940 is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda Saber can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 - 165 HP | 160 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 264 NM | 186 - 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.8 | |
|
Volvo 940 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Saber. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 is 3 cm longer than the Honda Saber, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 940 has 71 litres more trunk space than the Honda Saber. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`905 | ~ 1`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Honda Saber has
| |