Volkswagen Caravelle 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.2 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is larger. Volkswagen Caravelle is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | 256 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Caravelle has 954 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |