Volkswagen Caravelle 2004 vs Mercedes Vito 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 23.6 seconds | 19.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes Vito is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 2 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Mercedes Vito. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Caravelle) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |