Volkswagen Scirocco 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
BMW 4 series is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Scirocco engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW 4 series, whereas torque is 60 NM less than BMW 4 series. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Scirocco reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Scirocco over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Scirocco consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Scirocco) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Volkswagen Scirocco is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Scirocco is 38 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Scirocco is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 312 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1006 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Volkswagen Scirocco has 133 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Scirocco is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Scirocco has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |