Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Volvo S40 2000

 
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1988
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 54 HP102 HP
Torque: 100 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 20.3 seconds12 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 48 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 8.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.35.4
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.48 m
Width: 1.71 m1.72 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data853 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo S40 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv