Volkswagen Passat 2000 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2005
Volvo S60
2004 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.4 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 130 HP130 HP
Torque: 285 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds12 seconds
Volkswagen Passat is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Passat and Volvo S60 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Passat torque is 5 NM more than Volvo S60. Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.66.5
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1400 km on highway1370 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S60 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4, Skoda SuperbUsed also on Volvo S80
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Passat might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.58 m
Width: 1.75 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Passat is 12 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 475 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 51 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9602`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably better
Average price (€): 14003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv