Volkswagen Passat 2005 vs Mazda 6 2005

 
Volkswagen Passat
2005 - 2010
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP143 HP
Torque: 320 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds9.5 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1180 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1250 km on highway
1090 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.69 m
Width: 1.82 m1.78 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Passat is larger.
Volkswagen Passat is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 565 litres501 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 64 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0601`990
Safety:
Quality:
below average

average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 24001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Mazda 6 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv