Volkswagen Passat 2010 vs Volvo V60 2010

 
Volkswagen Passat
2010 - 2014
Volvo V60
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 160 HP180 HP
Torque: 250 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 seconds9.2 seconds
Volkswagen Passat is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 20 HP less power than Volvo V60, but torque is 10 NM more than Volvo V60. Despite less power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.9 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1090 km on highway
880 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.63 m
Width: 1.82 m1.87 m
Height: 1.52 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Passat is 15 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 603 litres430 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 173 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V60.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1302`100
Safety:
Volvo V60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low

average
Volvo V60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 54007600
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 9.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo V60 has
  • more power
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv