Volkswagen Passat 2010 vs Volvo V60 2011

 
Volkswagen Passat
2010 - 2014
Volvo V60
2011 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 105 HP115 HP
Torque: 250 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds11.3 seconds
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1590 km in combined cycle1480 km in combined cycle
1750 km on highway1630 km on highway
1220 km with real consumption1110 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.63 m
Width: 1.82 m1.87 m
Height: 1.52 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Passat is 15 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 603 litres430 litres
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Passat has 173 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V60.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1202`110
Safety:
Volvo V60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low

high
Volvo V60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 54007400
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 9.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo V60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv