Volkswagen Passat 1997 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Passat
1997 - 2000
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Body: Estate car / wagonMinivan / MPV
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.81.8 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 90 - 193 HP90 - 174 HP
Torque: 140 - 310 NM170 - 235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 - 16 seconds11.8 - 19.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 11.06.5 - 13.6
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.62 m
Width: 1.74 m1.81 m
Height: 1.50 m1.73 m
Volkswagen Passat is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 23 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 495 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Passat can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`999~ 1`940
Safety:
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 12001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv