Volkswagen Passat 1985 vs Volvo S40 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Passat
1985 - 1988
Volvo S40
1995 - 2002
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.21.6 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 54 - 136 HP90 - 200 HP
Torque: 100 - 184 NM143 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 - 25.2 seconds7.3 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 10.35.4 - 10.0
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.48 m
Width: 1.71 m1.72 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Passat is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data853 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo S40, which means Volkswagen Passat can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`267~ 1`761
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo S40 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv