Volkswagen Passat 2014 vs Volvo S80 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 - 240 HP | 109 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 500 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 8.7 seconds | 6.9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.3 | 4.9 - 11.3 | |
|
Volkswagen Passat petrol engines consumes on average 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S80. On average, Volkswagen Passat equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is smaller. Volkswagen Passat is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat has 106 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`065 | ~ 2`168 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |