Volkswagen Touareg 2005 vs Volvo XC90 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Touareg engine produces 47 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 120 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Touareg reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 13.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 15.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touareg is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touareg consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touareg over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touareg consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 440 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touareg gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Touareg is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Touareg is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | 2404 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 834 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touareg is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Volkswagen Touareg can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`945 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volkswagen Touareg has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC90 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touareg, so Volkswagen Touareg quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touareg has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |