Volkswagen Tiguan 2015 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Tiguan could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller. Volkswagen Tiguan is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Tiguan has 35 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Volkswagen Tiguan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |