Volkswagen Tiguan 2011 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Tiguan engine produces 80 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Tiguan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Tiguan could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Tiguan consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Tiguan is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Tiguan is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 1478 litres | |
| Volkswagen Tiguan has 2 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 32 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Tiguan is 1.3 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Volkswagen Tiguan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 1`853 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 390 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Tiguan has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |