Volkswagen Phaeton 2002 vs Volkswagen Phaeton 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.0 Petrol | 6.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 420 HP | 450 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Phaeton 2002 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Phaeton 2010, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Phaeton 2010. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.6 | 14.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Phaeton 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Phaeton 2002 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Phaeton 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Phaeton 2002 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Phaeton 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Phaeton 2002 and Volkswagen Phaeton 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Phaeton has
|
Volkswagen Phaeton has
| |