Volkswagen Phaeton 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Phaeton engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, but torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Phaeton reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 9.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Phaeton consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Phaeton could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Volkswagen Phaeton has 32 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Phaeton has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |