Volkswagen Phaeton 2010 vs Jaguar XF 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Phaeton engine produces 35 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Phaeton reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Phaeton consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Phaeton could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Phaeton consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.05 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volkswagen Phaeton is 10 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Phaeton is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.48 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Phaeton is 0.52 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Volkswagen Phaeton can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`760 | 2`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Phaeton has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |