Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Jaguar XF 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 20 HP less power than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat CC could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Passat CC) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 540 litres | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC has 8 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jaguar XF has
| |