Volkswagen Bora 2001 vs Skoda Octavia 2000

 
Volkswagen Bora
2001 - 2005
Skoda Octavia
2000 - 2004
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 100 HP90 HP
Torque: 240 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds15 seconds
Volkswagen Bora is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.6 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Bora could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1140 km on highway
830 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.51 m
Width: 1.74 m1.73 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Bora is 13 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia.
Gross weight (kg): 1`870no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 14001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 5.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv