Volkswagen Bora 1999 vs Volvo V40 1999

 
Volkswagen Bora
1999 - 2001
Volvo V40
1999 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP95 HP
Torque: 285 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds12.5 seconds
Volkswagen Bora is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 20 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.35.6
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1300 km on highway
930 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.41 m4.48 m
Width: 1.74 m1.72 m
Height: 1.47 m1.41 m
Volkswagen Bora is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Volkswagen Bora can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`880no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 1600600
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 6.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo V40 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv