Volkswagen Bora 1999 vs Volvo S60 2003

 
Volkswagen Bora
1999 - 2005
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP180 HP
Torque: 170 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds8.8 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 65 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.09.2
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Bora consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway980 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.41 m4.58 m
Width: 1.74 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Bora is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Bora is 17 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1470 litres1034 litres
Volkswagen Bora has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Bora has 36 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Bora (by 436 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8002`010
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 16001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv