Volkswagen Bora 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2005
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Volkswagen Bora is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Polo can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 2.81.2 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 68 - 204 HP55 - 150 HP
Torque: 128 - 320 NM108 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 - 18 seconds8.2 - 17.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 11.04.4 - 7.8
Volkswagen Bora petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Volkswagen Bora equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m3.92 m
Width: 1.74 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Bora is larger, but slightly lower.
Volkswagen Bora is 46 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litres1030 litres
Volkswagen Bora has 185 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 245 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Bora can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`840~ 1`663
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 14002400
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv