Volkswagen Bora 1998 vs Audi A3 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2005
Audi A3
2000 - 2003
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.81.6 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 100 - 204 HP90 - 180 HP
Torque: 145 - 310 NM148 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 13.7 seconds7.5 - 12.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 11.04.9 - 9.3
Volkswagen Bora petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Volkswagen Bora equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.41 m4.15 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Bora is 26 cm longer than the Audi A3, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1470 litres1120 litres
Volkswagen Bora has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Bora has 110 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Bora (by 350 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`881~ 1`766
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 16001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv