Volkswagen Bora 1998 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2005
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.81.6 - 4.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 204 HP100 - 275 HP
Torque: 145 - 310 NM148 - 370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 13.7 seconds6.8 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 11.05.5 - 13.0
Volkswagen Bora petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Volkswagen Bora equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.41 m4.68 m
Width: 1.74 m1.75 m
Height: 1.47 m1.50 m
Volkswagen Bora is smaller.
Volkswagen Bora is 27 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1470 litresno data
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Bora has 35 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 11 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Volkswagen Bora can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`881~ 2`080
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 16001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Volkswagen Passat has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv