Volkswagen Beetle 2003 vs Volkswagen Beetle 1999
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 172 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Beetle 2003 and Volkswagen Beetle 1999 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Beetle 2003 torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Beetle 1999. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Beetle 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Beetle 2003 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle 1999, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Beetle 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Beetle 2003 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle 1999. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 4.08 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Beetle 2003 and Volkswagen Beetle 1999 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 209 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 525 litres | |
Volkswagen Beetle 2003 has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Beetle 2003 has 61 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Beetle 1999. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`675 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Volkswagen Beetle has
| |