Volkswagen Beetle 2003 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 150 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 - 240 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 15.6 seconds | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.2 | 3.0 - 7.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Lupo. On average, Volkswagen Beetle equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle is larger. Volkswagen Beetle is 55 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Beetle is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 860 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Beetle has 140 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Beetle is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Volkswagen Beetle can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`761 | ~ 1`368 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Beetle has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |