Volkswagen Amarok 2009 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 154 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 26 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.1 | |
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Amarok could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.25 m | 5.21 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
Volkswagen Amarok is larger. Volkswagen Amarok is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 16 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Amarok is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Volkswagen Amarok can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`040 | 2`850 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 800 | 15 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Amarok has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |