Volkswagen Amarok 2009 vs Ford Ranger 2012

 
Volkswagen Amarok
2009 - 2016
Ford Ranger
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 180 HP150 HP
Torque: 400 NM375 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds12.3 seconds
Volkswagen Amarok is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Amarok engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Amarok reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.98.5
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Amarok consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Amarok over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway1030 km on highway
Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.25 m5.36 m
Width: 1.94 m1.85 m
Height: 1.82 m1.82 m
Volkswagen Amarok is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data1210 litres
Turning diameter: 13 meters12.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Amarok is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger.
Gross weight (kg): 3`0401`144
Safety:
Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Ranger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 17 80019 600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Amarok has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Ford Ranger has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv