VAZ 2109 1987 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2109 engine produces 51 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2109 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 65 litres | |
| 790 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.61 m | |
|
VAZ 2109 is smaller. VAZ 2109 is 31 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 13 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2109 is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 2`072 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2109 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |